Calling for Votes : Document popular protocol processes/tasks to accomplish with AsyncAPI #814
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
(copied over from https://github.com/orgs/asyncapi/discussions/379#discussioncomment-6574374, thank!) Hello all, IDK if this topic is considered closed, but here is some input. I am considering using AsyncAPI as a formalism to do Model-based design. This idea is that adding properties to our device ecosystem is first done by describing the properties in the form of a schema.yaml, and ideally using generator for the different bindings (mqtt/c++) and documentation we need. I have a prototype model repo, validated with AsyncStudio, and c++ generation produces code I can imagine to use in an embedded context, so far so good. One source of hesitation for me at this point is the complexity of aggregating several schema files. Ideally I do not wish to ask my contributors to add new channels, components, messages, traits etc... is the same file. There are few example here and there on using refs, or python tooling to aggregate or split schema part, but it seems a bit fiddly to me at least, so I'm not sure this is the right way to go. Some tutorial and example material for "distributed" model files would be great. It seems quite natural to have for each functional blocs of technical domain in the system, a dedicated schema file, with channels, message, payload layouts, etc... that the framework is able to aggregate to one schema file that can be used for generation. Thanks and regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In a discussion about preferred protocols here, the following protocols were voted most, and going by that, I will suggest topics suitable for these protocols and what categories they could fall under: Most voted protocols:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello!
As a part of the AsyncAPI Mentorship Program 2023, we’re creating new documentation for configuring different protocols with AsyncAPI. Vote on which protocols to prioritize documenting for this year’s program scope. List popular processes/topics/tasks you accomplish with AsyncAPI and your protocols of choice.
At the end of this vote, we will create documentation covering selected protocols from the other GSoD community vote for selecting protocols to prioritize in the 2023 Mentorship project scope.
🚀 Example topics to pitch:
✨ Our documentation is currently organized into the following content buckets:
This discussion will be closed after two weeks.
Vote and comment below on the resources you’d like to see covered.
Cc: @deberg @alequetzalli @fran @asyncapi/tsc_members
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions