Brew install (instructions) no longer accurate? #489
stevenbarich
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Where exactly are you getting these instructions as the README.md file is correct. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I am attempting to install Wineskin on OS Ventura (Nov 5, 2023). The instructions on this site are pretty simple using homebrew: "brew install --no-quarantine gcenx/wine/unofficial-wineskin"
However, running this command line produces an error:
"Warning: No available formula or cask with the name "gcenx/wine/unofficial-wineskin". Did you mean gcenx/wine/cx-llvm?"
So, I then ran an edited command of:
"brew install --no-quarantine gcenx/wine/cx-llvm"
That seemed to work better...stuff installed.
However, there were more Caveats:
"==> Caveats
cx-llvm is keg-only, which means it was not symlinked into /usr/local,
because this is an alternate version of another formula.
If you need to have cx-llvm first in your PATH, run:
echo 'export PATH="/usr/local/opt/cx-llvm/bin:$PATH"' >> ~/.profile
For compilers to find cx-llvm you may need to set:
export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/opt/cx-llvm/lib"
export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/opt/cx-llvm/include"
==> Summary
🍺 /usr/local/Cellar/cx-llvm/22.1.1: 2,246 files, 998.2MB"
Should I be at all concerned here?
But more importantly, shouldn't the instructions for install using homebrew be updated?
Cheers,
Steve
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions