Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace "0"s made in the unwrapping output with the original wrapped phase value #11

Closed
2 tasks done
scottstanie opened this issue Oct 5, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done

Comments

@scottstanie
Copy link
Contributor

scottstanie commented Oct 5, 2023

Since we don't want to make it impossible for a better unwrapping job, we'd rather keep the original wrapped phase where the unwrapper gave up.

  • Make sure we reset all data originally in the interferogram (both masked for unwrapping, and badly unwrapped areas)
  • Ensure that the edges haven't gotten slightly off of the nodata value. Every frame should be nans around the outside, and something nonzero inside
  • Make sure we have some clear mask layer which says "we think you should probably ignore these areas"
@scottstanie
Copy link
Contributor Author

Currently working for both snaphu and spurt (after this dolphin PR). Can reopen new issue if a new problem is discovered with it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant