Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timestamping hex digests #6

Open
petertodd opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Timestamping hex digests #6

petertodd opened this issue Apr 11, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@petertodd
Copy link
Member

Some users aren't going to want to reveal their files to the website, even if it's supposed to be client-side. It'd be good to have an "advanced" tab or similar that can timestamp and verify a SHA256 hex-encoded digest directly.

@lvaccaro
Copy link
Member

Added a pull request in order to pass the hex digest as get parameters : #7

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link

Additionally, the site says 100MB max file size. This would allow someone to generate a hash for something larger outside the browser and then copy it in.

It might also be nice to just allow arbitrary strings (with a 32 or 64 byte limit), allowing people to use different hash types or anything else that can be expressed in a short string.

@RCasatta
Copy link
Member

@Dreamsorcerer This is already been implemented follow the link @lvaccaro posted. We should better document it though and then close this issue

@Dreamsorcerer
Copy link

I thought the ticket was to create something like an advanced tab, so I can quickly enter a string and click the stamp button on the site. The pull request has presumably implemented the API to do this, but there is still no UI on the site to do this.

I'd much prefer to be able to do this with just clicking a button and not having to figure out how to make the right API request to submit it.

@RebekkalPangras
Copy link

Hi, I am trying to timestamp a digest. But the API call with get parameter doesn't seem to work. Is there any other way we can do timestamping of digests? Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants