-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How do we handle detailed policy? #578
Comments
I agree that it is good - if anything we want to have a tiered systemt that allows multiple tiers eg highlights, specific policies and details/data. Ideally the detail level allows us to work towards a fully costed approach - otherwise it becomes too easy to simply suggest ideas that although popular would be unaffordable. This would probably rule the first two options out. To simplify the 3rd, could we link to a specific wiki for the given policy. We could then differentiate between policies that had been elaborated on and those that were headline ideas. |
In transport.md would be a basic policy like "We will widen the roads". The only problems are that:
I don't know if that way is the best way. But the sooner you establish a method of doing it, the sooner I can include specific stuff relating to transport. |
More often now, people are refining outlined policies to add extra detail. This is good, and we don't want to stop it, but how do we align that with the need to be concise and readable?
We could:
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: