Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout when testing OGC API Features #246

Open
fabiovinci opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Timeout when testing OGC API Features #246

fabiovinci opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@fabiovinci
Copy link

fabiovinci commented Oct 2, 2024

It seems that there is a timeout issue with the Validator, specifically related to the OGC API - Features Test Suite.

The OGC validator fails to complete validation and the issue is impacting the INSPIRE Reference Validator which reuses the OGC test suite.

Related issue in the Validator-Helpdesk: Timeout when testing OGC API Features

Could you please check?

@cportele
Copy link
Member

cportele commented Oct 2, 2024

@fabiovinci - This repo is for the specification, not for the validator. I am, therefore, closing this issue here.

@ghobona @dstenger - Could you have a look and point @fabiovinci where he should record his issue, since it is related to the CITE deployment, not the OGC API Features ETS?

@cportele cportele closed this as completed Oct 2, 2024
@fabiovinci
Copy link
Author

fabiovinci commented Oct 2, 2024

Dear @cportele,

since the other Test Suites appear to be working fine, I thought the issue was specific to this particular test suite.

@ghobona @dstenger, please point me to the correct repository to open this issue if you can't move it yourself.

@cportele
Copy link
Member

cportele commented Oct 2, 2024

@fabiovinci - If it is specific to the ETS, the repo is here: https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-ogcapi-features10

@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Oct 2, 2024

I will transfer the Issue over to the https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-ogcapi-features10 repository.

Please note that @mbrachman is now responsible for CITE/Compliance testing and certification.

@ghobona ghobona transferred this issue from opengeospatial/ogcapi-features Oct 2, 2024
@ghobona ghobona reopened this Oct 2, 2024
@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

dstenger commented Oct 2, 2024

Thank you for reporting.

As documented here, the problem seems to only occur on Production and not Beta.
@fabiovinci Can you confirm that?

Revision 1.7.1 of the test suite is installed on Beta and revision 1.6 on Production. So, Beta uses a newer version of the test suite which contains, among other improvements, a fix about limiting tested data (#236).

Can you please check if the tested API contains large amounts of collections and/or items which might lead to a memory error in the validator?

We are planning to update Production, soon (this or next month). This means that the fix, currently just installed on Beta, will then be available on Production as well.

@dstenger dstenger added this to CITE Oct 2, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To do in CITE Oct 2, 2024
@dstenger dstenger moved this from To do to Waiting in CITE Oct 2, 2024
@fabiovinci
Copy link
Author

Dear @dstenger,

I confirm that the issue is only on the Production.

Can you please check if the tested API contains large amounts of collections and/or items which might lead to a memory error in the validator?

The service under test seems to contain numerous collections, even though I limited them to 3 during validation with Production. The tested collections may include a large number of items!

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

dstenger commented Oct 7, 2024

Thanks for confirming my assumptions.
The large number of items is most likely the root cause for the problem.

Then, the update of Production will solve the problem which is planned for this or next month. We will discuss this in the CITE team.

@dstenger dstenger moved this from Waiting to Needs discussion in CITE Oct 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Needs discussion
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants