Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document and modify accessibility vocabulary #19

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Document and modify accessibility vocabulary #19

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MRuecklCC
Copy link

@MRuecklCC MRuecklCC commented Jul 19, 2022

Consider this a proposal to resolve #18 please :)

Changes:

  • remove the none and WCAG concept.
  • added descriptions
  • added narrower relations between concepts to indicate ordering
  • split bitv concept into bitv-I and bitv-II

Discussion highly appreciated!

<b> a skos:Concept ;
skos:prefLabel "B" ;
skos:definition "The content does not comply to the WCAG A rating requirements."@en ;
skos:definition "Der Inhalt erfüllt nicht die WCAG Anforderungen für eine A-Wertung."@en ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"@de"

<none> a skos:Concept ;
skos:prefLabel "Nicht geprüft"@de ;
skos:prefLabel "Not tested"@en ;
<b> a skos:Concept ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe instead of just "b" something more meaningful? E.g. "failed" :D

@sroertgen
Copy link
Collaborator

Regarding the change of identifiers I strongly suggest to talk to @torsten-simon

The identifiers are just ...identifiers, so I'm not sure if we really need to change them. If changed, this might have implications on already assigned values and a migration has to be run.

Other than that I approve the description changes, just the language has to be adjusted as @lummerland suggested.

@torsten-simon
Copy link
Contributor

If we change any current identifiers, I need a mapping from the old to the new id in order to map existing content. I'm not sure if "meaningful" identifiers are that important, afaik we use uuid identifiers for newer vocabs which might do the job just fine.

@lummerland lummerland closed this Apr 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Accessibility Vocabulary
4 participants