Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[enhancement] hope could involve more idea base on the CMDB's CI notion #1228

Open
JarodWan opened this issue Jun 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@JarodWan
Copy link

First,thanks for the amazing project and let we have a solution to recording the things in DataCetner

and for we have lots of the thing in the datacenter, I hope could use this amazing tool to manage more and more CI in the datacenter,
Just like in the server, we have different hard disk model, like SAS, NL_SAS, SSD, etc. and we have different PCI-E device in the server, just like HBA card (8G, 16G), we have another network card with different speed (1G, 10G, 40G,etc), could we use the amazing tool to manage that thing together,
current, the opendcim could manage the chassis , that a big step to manage things in the datacenter, and I suggest, we could more forward, base on that idea to manage more and more different device ,

on the other hand, the storage array, we could use the same solution like chassis, as you know, the storage array will store lots of different disks, SAS, NL_SAS, SSD, and they will have different SKU or some code to remark their module

another suggestion for the power panel,
currently, we can use the tool to mark the power connection, maybe we could give out more PIC to let the end-use have more intuitive feeling for the power connection with the PIC, just like how many power socket, and with C13/14, C15/14, C19/20, or something else

and the end of this
hope the project could go better and let lots of people konw about

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant