Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order of Plans and Networks in columns #19

Open
MichalisKas opened this issue Jul 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Order of Plans and Networks in columns #19

MichalisKas opened this issue Jul 3, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@MichalisKas
Copy link

As far as I understand the factor that determines the arrangement of Plans and Networks in the corresponding columns is due date and alphabetical order respectively.

I suggest that:

  1. Plans are arranged by due date, but maybe makes more sense that the oldest (closest to due date) is on top, since that is most probably require user's attention/contribution. Of course, if the user had the chance to order these either in descendent or ascendant due date would be even better.

  2. Networks should be arranged by the level of user's involvement. For example, from top-down the networks which the user is:
    (a) Coordinator
    (b) Participant which has contributed
    (c) Participant with no contributions so far
    Then an alphabetical order could be the 2nd factor of course.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants