Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Home Facility filter in Users list #7510

Closed
NNSiri opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #7685
Closed

Support for Home Facility filter in Users list #7510

NNSiri opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #7685
Assignees
Labels
P1 breaking issue or vital feature

Comments

@NNSiri
Copy link

NNSiri commented Apr 1, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
On clicking to Users>Advanced Filters i cant select specific Taluka

Describe the solution you'd like
Since we have deployed in Taluka Hospitals in Karnataka, and we have 2 hospitals in many districts, we may scale it up to many more taluka hospitals. Hence we would require the advance filter option to filter out the taluka as well.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

@ankitmrj
Copy link

ankitmrj commented Apr 1, 2024

Hi @rithviknishad @NNSiri
Feature Request: Enhanced Filtering for Users

Problem Statement: Currently, in the Users section under Advanced Filters, there is no option to select specific Talukas, which limits our ability to efficiently manage and scale operations across Taluka Hospitals in Karnataka.

Proposed Solution: We request the implementation of a feature that allows users to filter based on Taluka. This would greatly benefit our organization as we expand our presence and operations within Karnataka.

Benefits:

Efficiency: Enables us to quickly identify and manage users associated with specific Talukas.
Scalability: Supports our growth strategy by facilitating management across multiple Taluka Hospitals.
Accuracy: Ensures precise user targeting and management within designated geographic areas.
Alternative Consideration: While we await this feature implementation, a temporary workaround could involve manually sorting and categorizing users based on Taluka information provided in their profiles. However, this manual approach is time-consuming and prone to errors, highlighting the necessity of an automated filtering feature.

Thank you for considering my feature request. I believe that this enhancement will significantly improve our workflow and contribute to the overall effectiveness of the platform.

@gigincg
Copy link
Member

gigincg commented Apr 2, 2024

@NNSiri The hierarchy in CARE are State, District, Local Body & Wards, And for users we have only State, District & Local Body. Local Body is an optional field when creating Users, therefore a Local Body filter for Users may not work as you would expect.

Can you tell us what would be the purpose of looking at Users from a certain Taluka? If the purpose is to filter users by a Home Facility, that can be implemented in a better way.

@gigincg gigincg added the blocked label Apr 2, 2024
@NNSiri
Copy link
Author

NNSiri commented Apr 8, 2024

@gigincg yes the purpose it to filter the users by Home facility. so if that is deployed, then that should be good.

@NNSiri
Copy link
Author

NNSiri commented Apr 16, 2024

Any update on this ? @gigincg

@nihal467 nihal467 added the P1 breaking issue or vital feature label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

⚠️ Refrain from assigning this issue to yourself if you have another P1 issue assigned that is not yet closed.

@rithviknishad rithviknishad self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@rithviknishad rithviknishad changed the title Advance filter for Users Support for Home Facility filter in Users list Apr 22, 2024
@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

Backend changes not required as backend already supports filtering by home facility

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage to Done in Care Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P1 breaking issue or vital feature
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants