We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When I define the DataType to be of type 'iri', this seems to be ignored for the result of a Function.
In the Predicate_Object sheet:
The generated RML mapping looks something like:
<#Function1> a rr:TriplesMap; a fnml:FunctionTermMap; fnml:functionValue [ ....
The result when using RMLMapper is a triple that looks like: <subject> a "http://example.com/uri"
I would expect: <subject> a ex:uri
When I manually add rr:termType rr:IRI to the RML mapping I do get the desired triple
<#Function1> a rr:TriplesMap; a fnml:FunctionTermMap; rr:termType rr:IRI; fnml:functionValue [ ....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Solved in v1.5.4
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks for solving this. Hower, now it seems that the Function always gets the datatype IRI.
So, when I have a Predicate_Object tab like this:
The resulting RML looks like:
<#DateReformat> a rr:TriplesMap; a fnml:FunctionTermMap; rr:termType rr:IRI;
I would expect:
<#DateReformat> a rr:TriplesMap; a fnml:FunctionTermMap; rr:datatype xsd:date;
anaigmo
No branches or pull requests
When I define the DataType to be of type 'iri', this seems to be ignored for the result of a Function.
In the Predicate_Object sheet:
The generated RML mapping looks something like:
The result when using RMLMapper is a triple that looks like:
<subject> a "http://example.com/uri"
I would expect:
<subject> a ex:uri
When I manually add rr:termType rr:IRI to the RML mapping I do get the desired triple
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: