-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynamic group membership #146
Comments
Groups with dynamically assigned members have been useful to me in other contexts. Perhaps the node_filter syntax could be used to define the group membership? |
Yes, I'm suggesting that the After thinking about this more, perhaps we don't need extensions to the
Of course, the syntax should continue to allow specifying members using the node template name as well. |
OK the concept and syntax is clearer to me now. |
I have a use case where I need dynamic group membership. For example, I may need a group of all the
Compute
nodes with less than 4G of RAM (where the memory size is either provided as an input or obtained through a discovery process). With our current group syntax, the only way to specify group members is through node template names. What if instead we defined some type ofmember filter
that dynamically selects group members based on property values? Of course this may require extensions to ourTOSCA Path
syntax to identify group members insideget_property
functions. Any suggestions?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: