Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please give SPM support some attention #77

Open
jakobmygind opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Please give SPM support some attention #77

jakobmygind opened this issue Nov 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jakobmygind
Copy link

Hi guys!

I see development of new features taking place, and the working SPM branch is lying dormant falling behind. As we are using the SDK in a government critical app I really need to know that SPM support won't be forgotten. Whether it is my SPM adaptation or something else is of no importance, but since SPM is now the official package manager of the platform, I hope support will be prioritised, such that optimisations, features and bug fixes will find their way into the SPM version as well.
Is this something we can rely on? 😬 @chriscombs @pbodsk @mariusc

Br

Jakob

@mariusc
Copy link
Contributor

mariusc commented Nov 6, 2020

Hey Jakob,

I see your concern and it makes sense. I want to clarify that we are not working on new features for the NStack SDK, the activity you have been seeing lately revolves around creating a demo project which showcases the already existing features in the NStack SDK.

Regarding SPM support, that is on our to do list and is something we would like to get shipped rather sooner than later. It's a matter of getting time for that. However, since we don't have the luxury of working on a single app, and we have to maintain multiple ones, all of them using either Carthage or CocoaPods, we must also keep support for those dependency managers, and having support for all three turned out to be a lot more complicated than expected.

Hope that answers your concerns :)

@jakobmygind
Copy link
Author

Hi @mariusc! Hope you're well!

Thank you, it does, and I of course understand that there's only so much time, and client apps need to be prioritized. However since NStack is a product in and of itself and is being sold externally (at least to our company) as a BAAS/SAAS, I hope the powers that be will help you in your efforts to support this by allocating the required time 😅

Best regards
Jakob

@mariusc mariusc added this to the NStack 6 milestone Nov 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants