You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current egs++ documentation offers a "better" alternative to define brachytherapy seeds that uses the CD geometry.
However, I think autoenvelope is clearly better than CD geometry for defining brachytherapy seeds in a geometry. This section should be re-written and use autoenvelope instead of CD geometry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current egs++ documentation offers a "better" alternative to define brachytherapy seeds that uses the CD geometry.
However, I think autoenvelope is clearly better than CD geometry for defining brachytherapy seeds in a geometry. This section should be re-written and use autoenvelope instead of CD geometry.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: