-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EpiNano output issue #148
Comments
Hi can you please try with the demo data? https://github.com/novoalab/EpiNano/tree/master/test_data/make_predictions Thank you |
I've tried to use the demo data from (https://github.com/novoalab/EpiNano/tree/master/test_data/make_predictions) and the commands from run.sh which requires Epinano_Variants.py. I've downloaded and installed version 1.2.4 but it still gives me an error: Commads: ############### ################ |
Please try removing the argument: "-s java -jar /apps/sam2tsv/2.0/share/jvarkit-sam2tsv-1.0-0/sam2tsv.jar" I believe that this is a mistake from a previous version |
yes but the version 1.2.4 doesnt allow other flags such as -n, -T either - those are from the previous version too It doesn't give me anything - also do I use sample.sorted.bam file or JUST sample.bam ? |
Hi, have you tried with the DEMO data with the right command line parameters as described in the README? |
you seem to be using parameters required for older versions of EpiNano |
I'll try that today. |
I'm trying to run Epinano_Predict.py using the demo data as follows: This initially gave me an error saying sklearn is not installed so I installed it (version 0.24.2) in the $EPINANO_HOME//epinano1.2_venv/lib/python3.6/site-packages/ directory (I'm running Python version 3.6.8) Traceback (most recent call last): It seems that the model was pickled using a different version of scikit-learn ? Please advise - also am I using the correct trained model ? |
Hi @SabeenRaza75 sorry it seems that you have problems with the versions installed and/or locations in which you have installed the dependencies, but I am unable to figure out why from the information given above. As a solution, I would suggest you to switch to using MasterOfPores, a Nextflow workflow that has EpiNano (and many other tools!) embedded in it. It does not require you to install any of the softwares nor their dependencies, and is also a great solution to ensure reproduciblity, traceability and monitoring of your computational resources used. Let me know if this solution worked for you. Thanks! |
The latest Epinano_Variants.py does not rely on the 3rd party |
We are using the scripts which you published on this paper and repeat the m6A calling using EpiNano, with the datasets published on Nature Communication (2019) including Curlcakes and yeast datasets.
EpiNano: Detection of m6A RNA Modifications Using Oxford Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing
· First Online: 04 June 2021
We are unable to get 2 output files: sample.per.site.var.csv and sample.per.site.5mer.csv
I think the Epinano_Variants.py was running since it could produce the analysis time, however, we got NO output files.
For yeast dataset:
Epinano_Variants.py \
For curlcakes dataset:
Epinano_Variants.py -c 36 -r $ref -b $folder_name.sorted.bam
analysis took 5.046196460723877 seconds
Could you please help with this issue?
Thank you,
Trinh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: