Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the SMPLParamRegressor #37

Open
MengXinChengXuYuan opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

About the SMPLParamRegressor #37

MengXinChengXuYuan opened this issue Apr 1, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@MengXinChengXuYuan
Copy link

MengXinChengXuYuan commented Apr 1, 2020

I wonder why the SMPLParamRegressor don't go in an iterative way to give the final smpl param? Like described in paper End-to-end Recovery of Human Shape and Pose?

I mean at test time, by using a 2D skeleton detector, we can first align the input body to the same orientation, once we get the output smpl (theta0, beta0) and camera param, we can fix the beta0 and only update theta0 (taking theta0 as initial value) according to the loss between the detected skeleton and the projected smpl skeleton, I think the result should be much more better for testing images.

I'm I right? Are there any shortcomings leaving out efficiency?

Looking forward to any discussion with you !!! ;p

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant