Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/zaoption #330

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024
Merged

Feature/zaoption #330

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

whaeck
Copy link
Member

@whaeck whaeck commented Feb 8, 2024

This adds an option for the zaid of continuous energy and photonuclear data ACE files:
- use za in the zaid regardless of the metastable state of the nuclide (default, this is how NJOY has always worked)
- use the metastable zaid rules (MCNP 6.3 or lower) in which we use za for ground state nuclides and use za + 300 + s * 100 for metastable nuclides (Am242 and Am242m are exceptions to this rule, for these we use 95642 and 95242 respectively)

In the future, we will use this new option to set up the new ZAID for xsdir 2.0 (e.g. Am242m1_293K_ENDF71 instead of 95242.81c).

kahlerac
kahlerac previously approved these changes Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kahlerac kahlerac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

... and another example of why users should always terminate an input line with a slash!

Base automatically changed from feature/sza to develop April 22, 2024 15:37
@whaeck whaeck dismissed kahlerac’s stale review April 22, 2024 15:37

The base branch was changed.

@whaeck
Copy link
Member Author

whaeck commented Apr 22, 2024

... and another example of why users should always terminate an input line with a slash!

And I keep telling them that ;-)

@whaeck whaeck merged commit d9a7ce7 into develop Apr 22, 2024
4 checks passed
@whaeck whaeck deleted the feature/zaoption branch April 22, 2024 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants