Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consolidate forks please? #62

Open
danielcompton opened this issue Aug 29, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Consolidate forks please? #62

danielcompton opened this issue Aug 29, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@danielcompton
Copy link

danielcompton commented Aug 29, 2016

I always find it confusing when there are flatland forks of libraries, sometimes the authors one is the canonical one, sometimes it is the flatland that is canonical, or has more activities. The group-id's on the POM aren't always consistent, further adding to confusion. Sometimes the links on one README go to the Clojars page for the other one. In general, I find it very confusing. Alan Malloy said this was done previously because Github didn't count contributions to repos that you didn't own, but I don't think that is the case any longer.

Would you please consider consolidating the flatland/ninjudd/amalloy, e.t.c. libraries, perhaps all into flatland? This would make my life as a maintainer a little bit easier.

Thanks!

@enragedginger
Copy link

+1 I'd like to use clojure-protobuf, but this is all so very fragmented and confusing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants