You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I always find it confusing when there are flatland forks of libraries, sometimes the authors one is the canonical one, sometimes it is the flatland that is canonical, or has more activities. The group-id's on the POM aren't always consistent, further adding to confusion. Sometimes the links on one README go to the Clojars page for the other one. In general, I find it very confusing. Alan Malloy said this was done previously because Github didn't count contributions to repos that you didn't own, but I don't think that is the case any longer.
Would you please consider consolidating the flatland/ninjudd/amalloy, e.t.c. libraries, perhaps all into flatland? This would make my life as a maintainer a little bit easier.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I always find it confusing when there are flatland forks of libraries, sometimes the authors one is the canonical one, sometimes it is the flatland that is canonical, or has more activities. The group-id's on the POM aren't always consistent, further adding to confusion. Sometimes the links on one README go to the Clojars page for the other one. In general, I find it very confusing. Alan Malloy said this was done previously because Github didn't count contributions to repos that you didn't own, but I don't think that is the case any longer.
Would you please consider consolidating the flatland/ninjudd/amalloy, e.t.c. libraries, perhaps all into flatland? This would make my life as a maintainer a little bit easier.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: