Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think about how to consider underpayments #28

Open
sisou opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Think about how to consider underpayments #28

sisou opened this issue Sep 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
feature A new feature

Comments

@sisou
Copy link
Member

sisou commented Sep 25, 2019

Can underpayments be considered and only a rest amount requested from the customer? Can those two paymens then be accumulated to fulfill the order payment?

Does this work and make sense for HTLCs in Phase 2?

An idea here was to look at an address balance instead of incoming transactions to determine if an order is paid, but that would fail if an address is re-used without being cleared.

@sisou sisou added the feature A new feature label Sep 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant