You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Context
Datasets often have date information additional to sampling date (e.g. symptom onset date, sequencing date, submission date). We have no good way of displaying / interrogating such data. An additional use case is datasets with sampling date but for which internal nodes have no temporal info.
Description
Add a "temporal" colour scale type to the existing 4 types. The values must be either floats (e.g. 2020.123) or YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. "2021-10-31"). We may extend this to allow ambiguity, but this can be left for subsequent work. Auspice will interpret such a value the same way as we currently interpret sampling dates, and generate a colour scale appropriately.
Related issues #1402 will discuss how filtering UI should behave here. Which branches we show as selected is up for debate, but I propose we treat this the same as filtering to traits where we trace back to the MRCA of selected tips, ignoring internal node annotations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was implemented in #1523 however this required all dates to be numeric. I'll leave this issue here but rename it to indicate that we wish to allow YYYY-MM-DD dates
jameshadfield
changed the title
Add temporal colouring scale
Add temporal colouring scale to use YYYY-MM-DD dates
Jun 30, 2022
Context
Datasets often have date information additional to sampling date (e.g. symptom onset date, sequencing date, submission date). We have no good way of displaying / interrogating such data. An additional use case is datasets with sampling date but for which internal nodes have no temporal info.
Description
Add a "temporal" colour scale type to the existing 4 types. The values must be either floats (e.g.
2020.123
) or YYYY-MM-DD (e.g."2021-10-31"
). We may extend this to allow ambiguity, but this can be left for subsequent work. Auspice will interpret such a value the same way as we currently interpret sampling dates, and generate a colour scale appropriately.Related issues
#1402 will discuss how filtering UI should behave here. Which branches we show as selected is up for debate, but I propose we treat this the same as filtering to traits where we trace back to the MRCA of selected tips, ignoring internal node annotations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: