Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

better sections #4

Open
kjappelbaum opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

better sections #4

kjappelbaum opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@kjappelbaum
Copy link
Contributor

I feel one issue is currently with "formats" like CML/JCAMP/SciData. They somewhat belong into the schema category but are different from efforts that really specify what kind of data needs to be recorded.

@kjappelbaum
Copy link
Contributor Author

For example, Awesome Materials Informatics has this section https://github.com/tilde-lab/awesome-materials-informatics#standardization-initiatives about formats.

@ml-evs
Copy link
Contributor

ml-evs commented Oct 16, 2020

I think my suggestion is to flatten the list a bit and remove the topic-specific headings and rely on the descriptions alone to specify e.g. organic reactions vs materials synthesis.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants