Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ignore] testing #19

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+22 −22
Open

[ignore] testing #19

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
275337d
Update suggestions.js
richiemccoll Mar 17, 2023
ede473f
chore: modify another file
richiemccoll Mar 17, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 16 additions & 16 deletions services/reviewbot/suggestions.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,20 @@
const suggestions = {
async create({ transformerType, payload }) {
switch (transformerType) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for sharing the code snippet. Here is my analysis and feedback:

  • Naming convention: The name transformerType could be more descriptive, such as transformerTypeName or typeOfTransformer.
  • Code formatting: The indentation is inconsistent which may make the code a little bit harder to read. The try-catch block is indented two spaces more than the switch statement. It's best practice to use a consistent number of spaces to indent your code. I suggest using 4 spaces for each level of indentation.
  • Error handling: The code should provide detailed error messages to help the user understand the problem. When an error occurs, the code throws a generic error message that doesn't specify the root cause of the problem.

Here's an updated version of the code with these improvements:

async create({ transformerTypeName, payload }) {
  switch (transformerTypeName) {
    case 'chatGPT': {
      try {
        const prompts = payload.map(file => this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt));
        const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts);
        return this._formatResponse(suggestions);
      } catch (error) {
        throw new Error(`Failed to process data with chatGPT transformer. Error: ${error.message}`);
      }
    }
    default: {
      throw new Error(`Unsupported transformer type: ${transformerTypeName}`);
    }
  }
}

Please note that without seeing the context of the code, it's hard to provide an exhaustive analysis. I hope this feedback helps you write better code.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are some suggestions for improving the code:

  1. Add more comments to the code to explain what the different parts of the code do. This will help other developers understand the intent of the code and make it easier to modify or maintain.

  2. Use consistent coding style throughout the code. For example, some of the code uses single quotes for strings, while other code uses double quotes. Choose one style and stick to it.

  3. Use more descriptive variable names. Instead of using short variable names like 'payload' and 'suggestions', use more descriptive names like 'filesToProcess' and 'generatedSuggestions'.

  4. Simplify the code by breaking it down into smaller functions. The create() function is quite long and could be split into smaller functions to improve readability and make it easier to test.

  5. Consider using try/catch blocks to handle errors more gracefully. For example, if the call to the ChatGPT service fails, the code currently throws an error which could crash the application. Instead, you could use error handling to display more helpful error messages to the user.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for sharing this code snippet with me. Here are some potential improvements that could be made:

  1. Use consistent coding style: While there is no standard coding style for JavaScript, it's important to be consistent within a codebase. This code snippet has inconsistent indentation, curly braces placement and variable naming conventions. A consistent coding style will allow contributors to more easily understand and maintain the code.

  2. Use descriptive variable and function names: The use of abbreviations and acronyms in variable names and function names can make the code harder to read and harder to maintain. Instead, use descriptive names that clearly communicate the purpose of the variable or function. For example, instead of payload, consider using a more specific name like filesToProcess or chatPrompts.

  3. Error handling: The current implementation throws a generic error when the ChatGPT API call fails. It would be more helpful to provide specific information about the error to aid in debugging. Additionally, it's a good practice to always provide informative error messages and handle them appropriately.

  4. Handle edge cases: The current implementation assumes that payload is always an array of files to process, and does not handle the case where it is not. Adding validation logic to ensure input is in the expected format can prevent issues further down the line.

Here's an example of how the code could be improved to implement some of these recommendations:

async create({ transformerType, filesToProcess }) {
    switch (transformerType) {
        case 'chatGPT': {
            try {
                const prompts = filesToProcess.map(file =>
                    this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt)
                );
                const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts);
                return this._formatChatGPTResponse(suggestions);
            } catch (error) {
                throw new Error(`Error calling ChatGPT API: ${error.message}`);
            }
        }
        default: {
            throw new Error(`Unsupported transformer type: ${transformerType}`);
        }
    }
}

_formatChatGPTResponse(suggestions) {
    // Do formatting here, e.g. flatten array and remove duplicates
}

I hope these suggestions are helpful to you as you review the code. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for sharing your code! Here are some suggestions for improvement:

  1. Consider breaking up the create method into smaller, more focused methods. Doing so will make the code more readable and easier to reason about. For example, you could create a method to handle each type of transformer.

  2. Use more descriptive variable and method names where possible. For example, prompts and suggestions could be renamed to make their purpose more clear.

  3. Add comments to explain any complex or unintuitive parts of the code, especially if you don't get feedback from your team members for your queries.

Here's an example of how the code could be refactored to address these suggestions:

async create({ transformerType, payload }) {
  switch (transformerType) {
    case 'chatGPT':
      try {
        const chatPrompts = payload.map((file) => this._callChatGPTService(file.prompt));
        const chatSuggestions = await Promise.all(chatPrompts);
        return this._formatChatResponse(chatSuggestions);
      } catch (error) {
        throw new Error(`Received error from chatGPT API + ${error.message}`);
      }
    default:
      throw new Error(`Unsupported transformer type: ${transformerType}`);
  }
}

_callChatGPTService(prompt) {
  // Calls the ChatGPT service and returns a Promise of the suggestion
}

_formatChatResponse(suggestions) {
  // Formats the ChatGPT suggestions and returns them
}

I hope you find these suggestions helpful! Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for sharing the code snippet. Here are a few suggestions for improvements:

  1. Variable Naming: It's recommended to use more descriptive names for variables to make the code more readable. For example, instead of using payload, you could name it files or filePrompts for better context.

  2. Error Handling: The current code uses a generic try-catch block to handle errors. It's better to have different error handling mechanisms based on the type of error. For example, you could use a catch block to handle network-related errors and another one for validation errors.

  3. Readability: The code can be more readable by properly indenting the code blocks.

Here's an updated version of the code with the suggested improvements:

async create({ transformerType, files }) {
  switch (transformerType) {
    case 'chatGPT': {
      try {
        const promptResponses = files.map(async file => {
          return this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt);
        });
        const suggestions = await Promise.all(promptResponses);
        return this.formatResponse(suggestions);
      } catch (networkError) {
        throw new Error(`Error from chatGPT API: ${networkError.message}`);
      }
    }
  }
}

formatResponse(suggestions) {
  // Code for formatting the response
}

I hope this helps in making the code more robust and readable. Let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the given code snippet, there are a few improvements that could be made:

  1. Consistent code formatting: The code has inconsistent indentation and formatting, which can make it difficult to read and understand. It's important to maintain a consistent coding style across your codebase to improve readability and maintainability.

  2. Code readability: The code can be difficult to understand due to its complexity and lack of proper spacing. Breaking the code into multiple lines and using proper indentation can greatly improve readability.

Here's an example of improved code formatting and readability:

async create({ transformerType, payload }) {
    switch (transformerType) {
        case 'chatGPT': {
            try {
                const prompts = payload.map(file => this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt));
                const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts);
                return this._formatResponse(suggestions);
            } catch (error) {
                throw new Error(`received error from chatGPT API + ${error.message}`);
            }
        }
    }
}
  1. Error handling: The current error handling is not sufficient. Instead of simply propagating the error message, it would be better to provide a more descriptive error message along with the original error stack trace. This would help in debugging and identifying the source of the error. Additionally, catching more specific errors would allow for better error handling and recovery.

Here's an example that includes more descriptive error handling:

async create({ transformerType, payload }) {
    switch (transformerType) {
        case 'chatGPT': {
            try {
                const prompts = payload.map(file => this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt));
                const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts);
                return this._formatResponse(suggestions);
            } catch (error) {
                throw new Error(`Error occurred while calling chatGPT API: ${error.message}`);
            }
        }
        default: {
            throw new Error(`Unsupported transformer type: ${transformerType}`);
        }
    }
}

By providing a more specific error message and handling unsupported transformer types, it enhances the overall robustness of the function.

case 'chatGPT': {
try {
const prompts = payload.map(file =>
this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt)
)
const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts)

return this._formatResponse(suggestions)
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`received error from chatGPT API + ${error.message}`)
}
}
}
},
async callChatGPTService(payload) {
const apiUrl = 'https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions'
const response = await fetch(apiUrl, {
Expand All @@ -22,22 +38,6 @@ const suggestions = {
s.choices.map(choice => choice.message.content.trim()).join('')
)
},
async create({ transformerType, payload }) {
switch (transformerType) {
case 'chatGPT': {
try {
const prompts = payload.map(file =>
this.callChatGPTService(file.prompt)
)
const suggestions = await Promise.all(prompts)

return this._formatResponse(suggestions)
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`received error from chatGPT API + ${error.message}`)
}
}
}
}
}

export default suggestions