Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate Configurations for Head and Worker Nodes #199

Open
PiercingDan opened this issue May 18, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Separate Configurations for Head and Worker Nodes #199

PiercingDan opened this issue May 18, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@PiercingDan
Copy link

PiercingDan commented May 18, 2017

It would be good to have separate configurations for head and worker nodes, for example, separate instance types, AMIs, and EBS volume sizes for head and worker nodes.

EDIT: I see a pull request is currently underway for separate master/worker instance types. Perhaps separate AMIs and EBS volume sizes would also be doable.

@nchammas
Copy link
Owner

Related: #166, #241.

@pferrel
Copy link

pferrel commented Jan 11, 2019

+1

You can't create just a master with slaves = 0. Otherwise you could create the master with one instance type then add-slaves with another.

@devyn
Copy link

devyn commented Jan 13, 2020

I would really like this because small clusters don't need a ton of compute resources for the master. You could drive 4 slaves of a relatively large instance type with a master of a much smaller instance type depending on your application and be totally fine.

Edit: it also seems like it would be quite easy to implement compared to colocating one slave on the same machine as the master, which should probably be optional because I would imagine that in clusters with hundreds of slaves, the master does need to have some beef to it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants