You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An idea for improvement, perhaps in the next phase of Tempo: There are some Tempo results that depend on FACETS (e.g. ccf, LOHHLA, etc). When we do re-fits, these results become incorrect. It would be nice to have a way to re-run only the Tempo results that depend of FACETS, once we've done the re-fits.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In TEMPO, the -resume function depending on the ID of the file, which includes size, timestamp, location, etc.
If manual curation was done for a certain file, then it can't be used as a valid resume caching, meaning the pipeline won't just skip DoFacets and use the curated result to do other works after DoFacets.
To achieve this, Facets results need to be accepted as an input for TEMPO, and also let TEMPO can start from after Facets.
This is definitely something we need to think about @md09
An idea for improvement, perhaps in the next phase of Tempo: There are some Tempo results that depend on FACETS (e.g. ccf, LOHHLA, etc). When we do re-fits, these results become incorrect. It would be nice to have a way to re-run only the Tempo results that depend of FACETS, once we've done the re-fits.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: