You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I noticed that if I have close points, the color represented does not correspond to the value of that point, but is influenced by the interpolation of adjacent points, I attach an image.
The values are the following (max=28) data = [ [50,150,16], [150,150,18], [250,150,20], [350,150,22], [450,150,24], [550,150,20], [650,150,28], [470,300,16], [500,300,18], [530,300,20], [560,300,22], [590,300,24], [620,300,20], [650,300,28] ];
The two rows have the same values, but those above (more distant) are represented correctly, while the row below, in particular the second value from the right, is influenced by the first on the right.
However, this is not correct because having that point a specific value should be represented based on the gradient, and the interpolation should act only in the blank space between two (or more) points.
Is there a way to optimize this situation?
Thanks for your work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I noticed that if I have close points, the color represented does not correspond to the value of that point, but is influenced by the interpolation of adjacent points, I attach an image.
The values are the following (max=28)
data = [ [50,150,16], [150,150,18], [250,150,20], [350,150,22], [450,150,24], [550,150,20], [650,150,28], [470,300,16], [500,300,18], [530,300,20], [560,300,22], [590,300,24], [620,300,20], [650,300,28] ];
The two rows have the same values, but those above (more distant) are represented correctly, while the row below, in particular the second value from the right, is influenced by the first on the right.
However, this is not correct because having that point a specific value should be represented based on the gradient, and the interpolation should act only in the blank space between two (or more) points.
Is there a way to optimize this situation?
Thanks for your work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: