You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
AFAIKT, there is no formal, documented "spec" for the format of a mixin.
It is implicitly defined by the eval methods, and discussed abstractly in these docs (which coincidentally should also be updated).
This is related to #36 which discusses the fact that typical jsonnet constructs are not natively supported (namely Top-level arguments and external variables).
In addition to supporting those (and all other?) jsonnet constructs, the mixin spec should be formalized and documented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are going to tackle a smaller scope for this quarter, which consists of documenting the practices we have implemented so far. This PR was opened for a review round: https://github.com/grafana/cloud-onboarding/pull/2711
AFAIKT, there is no formal, documented "spec" for the format of a mixin.
It is implicitly defined by the eval methods, and discussed abstractly in these docs (which coincidentally should also be updated).
This is related to #36 which discusses the fact that typical jsonnet constructs are not natively supported (namely Top-level arguments and external variables).
In addition to supporting those (and all other?) jsonnet constructs, the mixin spec should be formalized and documented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: