Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formally define and document the mixin spec #89

Open
rgeyer opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Formally define and document the mixin spec #89

rgeyer opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@rgeyer
Copy link
Contributor

rgeyer commented Jun 27, 2022

AFAIKT, there is no formal, documented "spec" for the format of a mixin.

It is implicitly defined by the eval methods, and discussed abstractly in these docs (which coincidentally should also be updated).

This is related to #36 which discusses the fact that typical jsonnet constructs are not natively supported (namely Top-level arguments and external variables).

In addition to supporting those (and all other?) jsonnet constructs, the mixin spec should be formalized and documented.

@gaantunes
Copy link

We are going to tackle a smaller scope for this quarter, which consists of documenting the practices we have implemented so far. This PR was opened for a review round: https://github.com/grafana/cloud-onboarding/pull/2711

@gaantunes
Copy link

Docs update PR: monitoring-mixins/docs#15

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants