You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd prefer it to be in 3-4 page sets instead of 2-3 . I haven't tried at all to figure out how to simplify the folding for that though, it might end up being a lot more trouble to cut out the pages
I read "3-4 page sets vs 2-3" as a row of 5 folios, 3 of which were one sig, 2 of which were part of another sig split across 2 rows. So still 6 rows, 3 folio each, with a tail end of 3 4-folio sigs (6/2 = 3)
if possible it would still be nice to add the 5 page option maybe...
The split row option would be a headache (have to lay out in batches of 40 🙄 ) but still very doable
The main blocker here is re-working the UX so that Wacky selection doesn't take up over half the page (blocker for several other new impositions too, really)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Kulapti (KQ#3584) see: https://discord.com/channels/726108551428440206/750875955219922964/1068368688236998656
I read "3-4 page sets vs 2-3" as a row of 5 folios, 3 of which were one sig, 2 of which were part of another sig split across 2 rows. So still 6 rows, 3 folio each, with a tail end of 3 4-folio sigs (6/2 = 3)
Also from potatoe#4771 see: https://discord.com/channels/726108551428440206/750875955219922964/1068610944885854278
The split row option would be a headache (have to lay out in batches of 40 🙄 ) but still very doable
The main blocker here is re-working the UX so that Wacky selection doesn't take up over half the page (blocker for several other new impositions too, really)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: