-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Please add the field multiselect #143
Comments
Hey @DetaliDigital - what sort of use cases for this do you have in mind? |
Ideas on use cases would still be welcome, that way it can be made sure that it's implemented the right way. |
Possible use case would be to choose which social media channels to include in a toolbar with sharing options. It seems to be mentioned here too: #32 I think using checkboxes would be the most straightforward way. Similar to how Checkbox TVs work: give them some input options like |
This is a very necessary option |
It would also be nice to have "Process tags in options" to dynamically populate the options with a chunk or snippet. +1 for checkboxes |
Another usecase : my client has a food truck and each morning she had to configure on his website (propulsed with Commerce, of course) which desserts will be avaible for the day : I'm also confirm than a checkbox view will be the most straightforward way (and not a multi-select list) |
I've tried to add this but am running into a js error I've not seen before and limited time to continue on it right now. In-progress at #176 |
### What does it do? This makes sure the JS doesn't throw an error in the case that the items-object is an array, just like in #16404 for 3.x ### Why is it needed? When using ExtJS to create components of the xtype: 'radiogroup' to be used in CMPs inside a form, this function gets called and tries to iterate over it's items array with a method that doesn't exist. This PR isn't changing the way forms or the clearDirty-method are handled, it just assures no error is thrown when using radiogroup-components. ### Related issue(s)/PR(s) Resolves modmore/ClientConfig#202 Resolves modmore/ClientConfig#176 Resolves modmore/ClientConfig#143 --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Coward <[email protected]>
Thank you for completing the package and solving issue # 61. We also ask you to expand the possibilities and add a new type of the multiselect field
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: