Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
## Describe your changes Going by the [roadmap](https://github.com/mllam/neural-lam/wiki/Roadmap) we are ready to release version 0.2.0 🥳 This PR just updates the changelog for this release (and also re-orders one entry that was put in the wrong place). Now this does the changelog update first, and then we create the release for the commit with the update, but I guess the order of this does not matter much. Something I am unsure about is if we want to now remove this version with the completed items from the roadmap? Could be good to have archived somewhere. Perhaps we could add a section for finished releases at the bottom. ## Github TODOs after meged: - [ ] Create release (there is a draft release ready) - [ ] Update roadmap ## Type of change - [ ] 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) - [ ] ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality) - [ ] 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [x] 📖 Documentation (Addition or improvements to documentation) ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] My branch is up-to-date with the target branch - if not update your fork with the changes from the target branch (use `pull` with `--rebase` option if possible). - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] For any new/modified functions/classes I have added docstrings that clearly describe its purpose, expected inputs and returned values - [ ] I have placed in-line comments to clarify the intent of any hard-to-understand passages of my code - [ ] I have updated the [README](README.MD) to cover introduced code changes - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [x] I have given the PR a name that clearly describes the change, written in imperative form ([context](https://www.gitkraken.com/learn/git/best-practices/git-commit-message#using-imperative-verb-form)). - [x] I have requested a reviewer and an assignee (assignee is responsible for merging). This applies only if you have write access to the repo, otherwise feel free to tag a maintainer to add a reviewer and assignee. ## Checklist for reviewers Each PR comes with its own improvements and flaws. The reviewer should check the following: - [ ] the code is readable - [ ] the code is well tested - [ ] the code is documented (including return types and parameters) - [ ] the code is easy to maintain ## Author checklist after completed review - [ ] I have added a line to the CHANGELOG describing this change, in a section reflecting type of change (add section where missing): - *added*: when you have added new functionality - *changed*: when default behaviour of the code has been changed - *fixes*: when your contribution fixes a bug ## Checklist for assignee - [x] PR is up to date with the base branch - [x] the tests pass - [ ] author has added an entry to the changelog (and designated the change as *added*, *changed* or *fixed*) - Once the PR is ready to be merged, squash commits and merge the PR.
- Loading branch information