You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The numbers show the difference, but the horizontal line is the same length because the scale of units to ticks is different, which makes the data change over time difficult to visually parse at a glance.
Proposed solution
Implement a --scale option that allows the user to specify how many units should be represented in 1 tick. For instance --scale=4 could mean that the numbers 1-4 are always represented by ▇, 5-8 as ▇▇, and so on.
The --scale=4 example here may not be the best that we can come up with, but is one possible solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
I would love to see a feature that lets the user specify a scale to use, rather than setting the max width.
Use cases
If a user does something like:
The produced graph is always scaled to the max width no matter what the values are. For instance, on one run it might be:
But later on it may be:
The numbers show the difference, but the horizontal line is the same length because the scale of units to ticks is different, which makes the data change over time difficult to visually parse at a glance.
Proposed solution
Implement a
--scale
option that allows the user to specify how many units should be represented in 1 tick. For instance--scale=4
could mean that the numbers 1-4 are always represented by▇
, 5-8 as▇▇
, and so on.The
--scale=4
example here may not be the best that we can come up with, but is one possible solution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: