Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement/QOLI: Invert Hide Selected Function - Should hide unselected (Interaction prototype included) #571

Open
FoxInTheB0xFFF opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request seeking feedback Seeking feedback from the community on this issue timescale/short-term Becomes timescale/imminent in weeks or months

Comments

@FoxInTheB0xFFF
Copy link

Hi there,

tldr; The interaction and/or solution isn't immediately obvious and the base interaction doesn't behave as expected.

There was a post a while back that I found after having a frustrating experience with the attack-navigator… Figured I would rehash the conversation as this really didn't make sense to me. Here is the original issue and the remarks w/Prototype

#57

I was running the matrix locally for a demo and ran into the same issues. Although it does make sense to hide-selected, the interaction is backwards.

Current Hide Workflow: Select tiles -> Select 'Disable' -> Select 'HIDE Disabled'

Hope this helps, as this was quite frustrating for me, especially after I accidentally selected a single item and lost my previous selections. This resulted in having to start all over.

@clemiller
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @FoxInTheB0xFFF,

Thank you for the suggestions! We recognize the process for hiding techniques from the matrix view could be improved and your comments are very helpful in understanding the areas that cause frustration. We will look into tackling this in the upcoming year.

On a related note, we have an issue open to improve the Navigator toolbar (#534), which aims to make the various controls more user friendly. I am linking it here so we can take your feedback for the layer controls into consideration when we start working on those improvements.

I'll leave this issue open and mark it as "seeking feedback" in case others would like to share their thoughts as well!

@clemiller clemiller added enhancement New feature or request seeking feedback Seeking feedback from the community on this issue timescale/short-term Becomes timescale/imminent in weeks or months labels Jan 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request seeking feedback Seeking feedback from the community on this issue timescale/short-term Becomes timescale/imminent in weeks or months
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants