You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have trouble reproducing your results with GIN on Cora under 20% Metattack. I used the pre-perturbed data provided by DeepRobust with Pro-GNN splits (data and splits). However, I only got 58.22±4.04 (10 reps), which is far from 72.2 in your paper. Even if the dataset split in Pro-GNN is different from yours, I don't think the results should be so different.
So I wonder if I made mistakes about the hyperparameters. I followed the hyperparameters in your paper and your code:
Hi,
Thanks for your great work!
I have trouble reproducing your results with GIN on Cora under 20% Metattack. I used the pre-perturbed data provided by DeepRobust with Pro-GNN splits (data and splits). However, I only got 58.22±4.04 (10 reps), which is far from 72.2 in your paper. Even if the dataset split in Pro-GNN is different from yours, I don't think the results should be so different.
So I wonder if I made mistakes about the hyperparameters. I followed the hyperparameters in your paper and your code:
Could you take a look and see which values of hyperparameters should I use? Thanks.
P.S. To save memory, I changed
cosine_similarity
indefense/gin.py
:GNNGuard/defense/gin.py
Lines 157 to 159 in 33f5390
to the following:
I think this code should be equivalent to yours.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: