Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plans for support apollo server 3? #179

Closed
fridaystreet opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Any plans for support apollo server 3? #179

fridaystreet opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@fridaystreet
Copy link

Hi Michael,

Just wondered if this was on your radar at all and if so any sort of timeframe? If not and you're up for a discussion I'd be happy to try and work through a list of requirements/tasks and see if can get a plan of action. And also happy to help with the tasks.

Cheers
Paul

@michalkvasnicak
Copy link
Owner

@fridaystreet unfortunately I don't have a time to work on this library actively so it would be really nice if someone else would take care of this :)

The plan would be to release current version as 1.0 and the one with Apollo Server 3 as 2.0 if there are any breaking changes.

@fridaystreet
Copy link
Author

Hi Michael,

Thanks for getting back to me. I must say I haven't really touched it since last year when we implemented it, which is testimont to it being a great library I'd say :-) But yes, we're looking at apollo 3 now. I really like the simplicity of this in keeping it serverless. So far we haven't had any issue with it, it's been running quite happily in production albeit with a few tweaks we made to suit our needs.

I'll start having a look at what's involved and see if we can move this forward. Maybe we can keep this open as a place holder as I might have some questions if that's ok? I'm sure once we get moving there would be some others on here that would be happy to contribute as well.

Cheers
Paul

@fridaystreet
Copy link
Author

For reference to anyone finding this. One of our devs has been working on this for our own use and has released a fork. See his comments here in another issue.

#128 (comment)

Will look at some sort of merge/PR if required

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants