-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Monitor how often each binary constraint rejects a proposal #166
Comments
This would be good for benchmarking/troubleshooting weird chain behavior. |
Implemented in #182, but creates big log files for lengthy runs. My plan was to instead track things with a dictionary in @apizzimenti Are you still working on this? If so, this morning's master has the first implementation. There was a little bit of talk on gitter about this as well. (I'll stay away from this unless you've moved on!) |
(Accidentally unassigned myself – oops) I was going to take a look at it after work today, as it seemed reasonably low-priority and I have some stuff to tackle back in Iowa right now. I can take your idea on improving #182 and run with it a bit, though. |
All yours then - try whatever you like! Just ping in here if you want
someone else to jump on it.
…On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 15:37 Anthony Pizzimenti ***@***.***> wrote:
(Accidentally unassigned myself – oops)
I was going to take a look at it after work today, as it seemed reasonably
low-priority and I have some stuff to tackle back in Iowa right now. I can
take your idea on improving #182
<#182> and run with it a bit,
though.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#166 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMyLFzZ1hUmVBH0QM09FdLnd1I45N0zlks5uHj0HgaJpZM4VNeSv>
.
|
Was just flipping through chain stuff and I saw this issue -- I have something kind of like this working. Currently, The implementation for sequential checks is really basic. I added The keys of the dictionary are the constraint function objects themselves, so there's no need to try to come up with key names for every constraint that might get passed through. |
Awesome! That seems like the right way to do this. I can add it and merge it in sometime soon. |
We could have an alternative Validator that checks all the constraints and keeps Counters of how often each constraint is true/false.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: