Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverse associations represented from both sides in generated conceptual model documentation #816

Open
jakubklimek opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation-generators Documentation generators (Respec)

Comments

@jakubklimek
Copy link
Contributor

jakubklimek commented Dec 5, 2024

See e.g. here generated from this project.

The issue seems to be, that reverse associations have both directions represented in the generated documentation (only one is expected), and the XML documentation is linking to the wrong one:
image

image

We can either remove the direction that is not used in the data structures, or, If we want to keep both sides, we need to make sure that they are not represented in a confusing way (correctly identify range in that direction, change label to "Je ve vztahu" or something like that indicating the direction), and that the correct direction is linked from the XML documentation.

e.g. lodview has:
image

@jakubklimek jakubklimek added bug Something isn't working documentation-generators Documentation generators (Respec) labels Dec 5, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek added this to the NRP first version milestone Dec 5, 2024
@jakubklimek jakubklimek changed the title Reverse associations have domain indicated as "Type" in generated conceptual model documentation Reverse associations represented from both sides in generated conceptual model documentation Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working documentation-generators Documentation generators (Respec)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants