-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One BMO controls multiple Ironic #1667
Comments
This is an interesting request, but it's going to be tricky. For instance: how does BMO know, which Ironic to talk to for each specific BareMetalHost? What should BMO do what only some of the Ironics are available? Should we support migrating hosts between Ironics (if yes, how?)? On a related note, make sure conductor groups don't solve your problems. |
/triage accepted |
I would like to write an article to explain it. |
One BMO controls multiple Ironic.pdf |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
User Story
We have many data centers scattered across the country, and we want to create a BMO on the central cloud to manage the ironic of each data center, to achieve the creation of bare metal k8s clusters.
Detailed Description
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]
One BMO can manage several Ironic.
Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]
/kind feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: