-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable sending feedback on per widget basis #926
Comments
Okay, so after some looking around the code it seems that the easiest approach would be:
It's trivial to implement, but still a lot of work for very small feature. I can work on it, but is it really that useful that it's worth the time? Other, much simpler approaches:
Any opinions on this one? |
What the user requested was disabling for a widget, so I think alternative no.1 is not the way to go (I can't even imagine a use case for that). The basic questions are: While writing I had an idea about placing the checkbox: It could be hidden by the "custom feedback" button and placed at the beginning of the line that appears when clicking it. |
Yes, as I stated originally I would be willing to do that. Small clarification for no.1 - by global I've meant per each individual widget instance, for example if we take a vcspeeddial there would be a checkbox that disables all feedbacks for this specific vcspeeddial. Still I don't like no.1, just see it as an option. |
This was originally suggested here: http://www.qlcplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=10158&p=46291#p46273
I would see it like this:
In any VCwidget that sends feedback could have a "send feedback" checkbox under "custom feedback". This checkbox is bound to a flag that basically disables updateFeedback execution. This checkbox is selected by default and affects specific VCwidget, so someone might have a button and slider bound to the same button on console and have the slider not mess custom feedback data up.
It seems to be trivial to implement and might me useful for someone.
If nobody points any major drawback in it and nobody picks this up I'll work on it on next weekend and file a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: