Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Type constraint for loads and stores needs reconsideration #60

Open
mattkretz opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Type constraint for loads and stores needs reconsideration #60

mattkretz opened this issue May 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mattkretz
Milestone
P1928R7 (TS merge)

Comments

@mattkretz
Copy link
Owner

The TS required a pointer to vectorizable type for loads and stores. At the latest when std::complex becomes a vectorizable type this is incorrect. The constraint should probably be std::convertible_to<iter_value_t<It>, value_type>. Or rather a Mandate?

Related: #9
@mattkretz mattkretz added this to the P1928R4 milestone May 9, 2023
@mattkretz mattkretz self-assigned this May 9, 2023
@mattkretz mattkretz moved this to Todo in std::simd in C++26 May 9, 2023
@mattkretz
Copy link
Owner Author

Wait on the result of #65

@mattkretz mattkretz moved this from Todo to Awaiting Direction in std::simd in C++26 May 15, 2023
@mattkretz mattkretz moved this from Awaiting Direction to Undecided in std::simd in C++26 Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mattkretz mattkretz

Labels
None yet
Projects
std::simd in C++26
Status: Undecided
Milestone
P1928R7 (TS merge)
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mattkretz