Is it possible to not update the updated_at
value for highlights that have already been imported?
#78
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Hi there, Sorry for the late reply, I just got back from a vacation so I'm catching up on October related messages. I just had a quick look and as far as I can tell, nothing October does sets the The Highlight CREATE method states
which is what October has been relying on but perhaps it's the case that this isn't quite true and the I'll do some experimenting to see if this holds true and if so, I can reach out to the Readwise developers to confirm if that behaviour is expected or not. This sort of falls into #16 territory where keeping a sync log rather than relying on the API to do deduplication would probably help a lot in cases like this but it's distinct enough that if I can replicate the behaviour, I'll create a Github issue to track it. Thanks for raising this for discussion. I hadn't used the export API for anything myself so I wouldn't have noticed otherwise! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes. The official integration doesn't work for me. It is never able to find any highlights. So if you can add that toggle, that would be great. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi.
Is it possible to not update the
updated_at
value for highlights that have already been imported?I assume the
updated_at
value is set by the Readwise API and is not something October is able to control. But, updating theupdated_at
value for existing highlights every time you perform a sync conflicts with the recommended export method (GET https://readwise.io/api/v2/export/
):Changing the
updated_at
value for highlights that didn't actually update causes them to be re-exported and results in duplicates at my export destination.The Readwise API docs say:
Do you know if the above still updates
updated_after
?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions