You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to sort data from Behnke Fried contacts. However, the exact or even approximate geometry of the contacts is unable to be determined. I am wondering if there is anyone to run this algorithm without using a geom.csv file.
I know that in the old (MATLAB) version of mountainsort there was an 'adjacency_radius' flag which could be set to 0 to sort each channel independently or to -1 to indicate that there is only one electrode neighborhood containing all the channels. I am wondering if this functionality is exposed in the new mountainsort algorithm using the MountainLab? That is, the one that is installed using
@marcoistasy I would recommend creating a geom.csv that has all the electrodes located at (0,0). Or make up a linear geometry. Then they will all be sorted together in one neighborhood.
Hello,
I am trying to sort data from Behnke Fried contacts. However, the exact or even approximate geometry of the contacts is unable to be determined. I am wondering if there is anyone to run this algorithm without using a
geom.csv
file.I know that in the old (
MATLAB
) version ofmountainsort
there was an 'adjacency_radius' flag which could be set to0
to sort each channel independently or to-1
to indicate that there is only one electrode neighborhood containing all the channels. I am wondering if this functionality is exposed in the newmountainsort
algorithm using theMountainLab
? That is, the one that is installed usingas per here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: