-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Adopt the four-quandrant documentation system #5549
Comments
@bajtos, I agree with you that some of our docs page are mixed with how-tos and explanation.
+1 |
@bajtos In addition to what you proposed, I would like all of us to think about the following perspectives:
|
The adoption process was started by #5718 and will continue in the following pull requests and issues:
Closing this issue as done. |
I am proposing to adopt the documentation system described at https://documentation.divio.com and successfully used by Django and others, and reorganize our documentation along the following four directions:
You can also watch the talk from PyCon Australia 2017 where this system was explained: https://youtu.be/t4vKPhjcMZg
In this issue, I'd like to keep the discussion at high-level and reach consensus whether such documentation system is something we all agree to asses and if we decide to implement it, then we will be all following it going forward.
An example of an existing doc page that's mixing different directions:
rest
optionsNext steps
docs
or as tsdoc comments in code?), etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: