Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[firtool] Run LowerFormalToHW pass when emitting SV #7837

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions lib/Firtool/Firtool.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ LogicalResult firtool::populateLowFIRRTLToHW(mlir::PassManager &pm,

LogicalResult firtool::populateHWToSV(mlir::PassManager &pm,
const FirtoolOptions &opt) {
pm.addPass(verif::createLowerFormalToHWPass());

if (opt.shouldExtractTestCode())
pm.addPass(sv::createSVExtractTestCodePass(
Expand Down
72 changes: 27 additions & 45 deletions test/Dialect/FIRRTL/SFCTests/directories.fir
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -140,56 +140,38 @@ circuit TestHarness:
; MLIR_OUT: }

; MLIR_OUT: om.class @SitestBlackBoxMetadata(%basepath: !om.basepath) -> [[V1:.+]]: !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, [[V2:.+]]: !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, [[V3:.+]]: !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: %0 = om.constant "Foo_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: %1 = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, %0) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: %2 = om.constant "Bar_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: %3 = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, %2) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: %4 = om.constant "Baz_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: %5 = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, %4) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: om.class.fields %1, %3, %5 : !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[STR1:%.+]] = om.constant "Foo_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ1:%.+]] = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, [[STR1]]) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[STR2:%.+]] = om.constant "Bar_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ2:%.+]] = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, [[STR2]]) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[STR3:%.+]] = om.constant "Baz_BlackBox" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ3:%.+]] = om.object @SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema(%basepath, [[STR3]]) : (!om.basepath, !om.string) -> !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: om.class.fields [[OBJ1]], [[OBJ2]], [[OBJ3]] : !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>, !om.class.type<@SitestBlackBoxModulesSchema>
; MLIR_OUT: }

; MLIR_OUT: om.class @MemorySchema(%basepath: !om.basepath, %name_in: !om.string, %depth_in: !om.integer, %width_in: !om.integer, %maskBits_in: !om.integer, %readPorts_in: !om.integer, %writePorts_in: !om.integer, %readwritePorts_in: !om.integer, %writeLatency_in: !om.integer, %readLatency_in: !om.integer, %hierarchy_in: !om.list<!om.path>, %inDut_in: i1, %extraPorts_in: !om.list<!om.class.type<@ExtraPortsMemorySchema>>, %preExtInstName_in: !om.list<!om.string>) -> (name: !om.string, depth: !om.integer, width: !om.integer, maskBits: !om.integer, readPorts: !om.integer, writePorts: !om.integer, readwritePorts: !om.integer, writeLatency: !om.integer, readLatency: !om.integer, hierarchy: !om.list<!om.path>, inDut: i1, extraPorts: !om.list<!om.class.type<@ExtraPortsMemorySchema>>, preExtInstName: !om.list<!om.string>)
; MLIR_OUT: om.class.fields %name_in, %depth_in, %width_in, %maskBits_in, %readPorts_in, %writePorts_in, %readwritePorts_in, %writeLatency_in, %readLatency_in, %hierarchy_in, %inDut_in, %extraPorts_in, %preExtInstName_in : !om.string, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.integer, !om.list<!om.path>, i1, !om.list<!om.class.type<@ExtraPortsMemorySchema>>, !om.list<!om.string>
; MLIR_OUT: om.class @MemoryMetadata(%basepath: !om.basepath) -> (foo_m_ext_field: !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, bar_m_ext_field: !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, baz_m_ext_field: !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>)
; MLIR_OUT: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA
; MLIR_OUT: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT: om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant "foo_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<8 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<0 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_0
; MLIR_OUT: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT: om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant "bar_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<2 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<8 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<0 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_1
; MLIR_OUT: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_2
; MLIR_OUT: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT: om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant "baz_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<3 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<8 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<0 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.class.fields %4, %20, %38 : !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ1:%.+]] = om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant "foo_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<8 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<1 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<0 : ui32> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_0
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ2:%.+]] = om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant "bar_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<2 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_1
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.path_create instance %basepath @memNLA_2
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.list_create
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: [[OBJ3:%.+]] = om.object @MemorySchema
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant "baz_m_ext" : !om.string
; MLIR_OUT-DAG: om.constant #om.integer<3 : ui64> : !om.integer
; MLIR_OUT: om.class.fields [[OBJ1]], [[OBJ2]], [[OBJ3]] : !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>, !om.class.type<@MemorySchema>

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is fine. However, this test in appropriately combined directory testing with OM testing. (Apparently, my past self thought the same thing: #5224 (comment))

If it's cleaner, in a follow-on, to either (1) factor this out of this test or (2) just delete this part of the test, then that would be good. @prithayan: Do you have any thoughts here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabianschuiki fabianschuiki Nov 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that would be great! I'll land this for now. Let's see what @prithayan thinks.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the messy lit tests and missing out your original review @seldridge , I think it makes sense to remove the testing from here. I added the om classes just because the original test was checking for the metadata verbatim ops, which will be replaced by the OM. I will take up the task to cleanup the tests.

; SITEST_NODUT: FILE "design.sitest.json"
; SITEST_NODUT-NOT: FILE
Expand Down
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions test/firtool/formal.mlir
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
// RUN: firtool %s --verilog | FileCheck %s

// Sanity check to ensure that formal unit tests are lowered to top-level
// modules.

// CHECK: module Foo()
// CHECK: module Bar()

verif.formal @Foo {}
verif.formal @Bar {}
Loading