Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

protofsm: update GR Manager usage and start using structured logging #9342

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ellemouton
Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR touches the protofsm package for 2 reasons:

  1. update to use the latest GoroutineManager API introduced in: fn: Remove ctx from GoroutineManager constructor #9341
  2. Update the StateMachine to thread a context through and to take a context via its API methods where it makes sense. With this update, logging can also be switched to the new structured logging pattern which allows us to avoid having to specify the FSM(%V) string for each log line

Depends on: btcsuite/btclog#20

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
protofsm/state_machine.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -101,8 +102,8 @@ type DaemonAdapters interface {
// TODO(roasbeef): could abstract further?
RegisterConfirmationsNtfn(txid *chainhash.Hash, pkScript []byte,
numConfs, heightHint uint32,
opts ...chainntnfs.NotifierOption,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prob the main stylistic diff in the codebase rn, but I prefer this option as it makes it clearer where the args end, and the return value starts.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Imo that only holds if the return values can in-fact fit on one line which is not always the case.
Personally I find the ) { on the unindented line strange

daemonEvent.TargetPeer.SerializeCompressed(),
lnutils.SpewLogClosure(daemonEvent.Msgs),
)
log.DebugS(ctx, "Sending message",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have a print sample of the before and after here re formatting?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ellemouton ellemouton Dec 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Starting state machine
2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Sending event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Applying new event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Processing event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Adding new internal event to queue event !BADKEY=(*protofsm.goToFin)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [INF]: FSM(test) State transition from_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart to_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart
2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Processing event event=(*protofsm.goToFin)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [INF]: FSM(test) State transition from_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart to_state=*protofsm.dummyStateFin

log.Debugf("FSM(%v): processing "+
"daemon %v daemon events",
s.cfg.Env.Name(), len(dEvents))
log.DebugS(ctx, "Processing daemon events",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this upper case construct something new we're attempting to make standard with the new logging format?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in general we go for log lines that start with upper case? searching around the code base, i can see that most of our log lines start with an upper case letter

ctx context.Context) context.Context {

return btclog.WithCtx(ctx,
btclog.Fmt("fsm_name", s.cfg.Env.Name())) //nolint:govet
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there anyway we can keep the old prefix nature? At least when scanning, IMO it's useful for it to be at the very start as depending on the size of your editor/viewport, the end of the line may require moving the cursor to actually view.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as the library stands today, no. But what can be done is: to create a prefixed logger in NewStateMachine and then carry that around in the StateMachine struct. Then we just need to remember to do s.log.* for log lines.

shall we do that instead here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok i've added a temporary commit at the end that does it this way. Let me know if you think this is ok and i can squash in the change.

The logs now look like this:

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Starting state machine
2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Sending event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Applying new event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Processing event event=(*protofsm.emitInternal)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Adding new internal event to queue event !BADKEY=(*protofsm.goToFin)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [INF]: FSM(test) State transition from_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart to_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart
2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [DBG]: FSM(test) Processing event event=(*protofsm.goToFin)(0x1045f1240)({
})

2024-12-10 13:20:44.552 [INF]: FSM(test) State transition from_state=*protofsm.dummyStateStart to_state=*protofsm.dummyStateFin

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

squashed in the temp commit

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for taking a look @Roasbeef - responded to your comments

protofsm/state_machine.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
log.Debugf("FSM(%v): processing "+
"daemon %v daemon events",
s.cfg.Env.Name(), len(dEvents))
log.DebugS(ctx, "Processing daemon events",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in general we go for log lines that start with upper case? searching around the code base, i can see that most of our log lines start with an upper case letter

ctx context.Context) context.Context {

return btclog.WithCtx(ctx,
btclog.Fmt("fsm_name", s.cfg.Env.Name())) //nolint:govet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as the library stands today, no. But what can be done is: to create a prefixed logger in NewStateMachine and then carry that around in the StateMachine struct. Then we just need to remember to do s.log.* for log lines.

shall we do that instead here?

@ellemouton ellemouton requested a review from Roasbeef December 10, 2024 11:23
@ellemouton ellemouton force-pushed the slogProtofsm branch 2 times, most recently from b0afb02 to d9194ed Compare December 12, 2024 08:02
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

squashed in the prefixed logging change & also added the commit for using a pointer to the GM instead as discussed @Roasbeef. PTAL 🙏

This bump includes a fix which prevents attribute value quoting if the
value string contains a newline character. This is so that if we call
spew.DumpS(), the output will stay nicely formatted.

The update also includes a couple more Hex helpers which we can make use
of now.
Update to use the latest version of the GoroutineManager which takes a
context via the `Go` method instead of the constructor.
So that we dont have to remember to add the `FSM(%v)` prefix each time
we write a log line.
@saubyk saubyk requested a review from bhandras December 12, 2024 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants