Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for OptimizationNLopt to 0.3, (keep existing compat) #103

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the OptimizationNLopt package from 0.2 to 0.2, 0.3.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@oschulz oschulz force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2024-12-12-00-10-18-062-02776272181 branch from 6788e46 to bc8ce65 Compare December 12, 2024 00:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.33%. Comparing base (e555cbf) to head (bc8ce65).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #103      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   21.39%   21.33%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        3305     3305              
==========================================
- Hits          707      705       -2     
- Misses       2598     2600       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fhagemann
Copy link
Contributor

fhagemann commented Dec 12, 2024

These are the relevant changes, not sure if they affect us:
https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/compare/f5ae5b0..f799a38#diff-58e1e08
(But I think the most relevant change is going to Optimization@4)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant