You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although rare, they can easily happen. When making sure to generate a unclusterable network (by corrupting some coalitions' edges): have to make sure those edges aren't a bridge of the coalition.
In that case, we have not corrupted a cluster into a noncoalition, but merely split it into two coalitions.
Practically irrelevant, since the final count of noncoalitions DOES match reality (even if it isn't equal to the starting/planned number of noncoalitions).
However number of coalitions (and therefore also all clusters/components) has thus risen by one, which is unaccounted in every way. Again, law of large numbers means:
1. Reduces the amount of bridge nodes.
2. It's practically irrelevant for the final percentage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bug for feature #8 #8
Although rare, they can easily happen. When making sure to generate a unclusterable network (by corrupting some coalitions' edges): have to make sure those edges aren't a bridge of the coalition.
In that case, we have not corrupted a cluster into a noncoalition, but merely split it into two coalitions.
Practically irrelevant, since the final count of noncoalitions DOES match reality (even if it isn't equal to the starting/planned number of noncoalitions).
However number of coalitions (and therefore also all clusters/components) has thus risen by one, which is unaccounted in every way. Again, law of large numbers means:
1. Reduces the amount of bridge nodes.
2. It's practically irrelevant for the final percentage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: