Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abstract Postag handling #7

Open
LFDM opened this issue Mar 21, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Abstract Postag handling #7

LFDM opened this issue Mar 21, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@LFDM
Copy link
Member

LFDM commented Mar 21, 2014

Not a bright idea to hardcode the meaning of every postag datapoint. A param should be passed that contains this information. When this information is not present we might want to return datapoint{1-n} only.

LFDM added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2014
... and comment about further abstractions mentioned also in #7
@LFDM LFDM added the important label Apr 5, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant