You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an operator I would like to have the mnemonic secret file to be read by the underlying process instead of being read and passed through as a string.
The current setup is functional, but it creates a trust situation when multiple operators may have access to a given machine. While it may be argued that operators with access to the machine should be trusted, I would argue that having the mnemonic as something globally visible by any user is exposing the service to risk which should be otherwise clamped down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As an operator I would like to have the mnemonic secret file to be read by the underlying process instead of being read and passed through as a string.
The current setup is functional, but it creates a trust situation when multiple operators may have access to a given machine. While it may be argued that operators with access to the machine should be trusted, I would argue that having the mnemonic as something globally visible by any user is exposing the service to risk which should be otherwise clamped down.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: