Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide whether we keep the gRPC API? #173

Open
shaneutt opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Decide whether we keep the gRPC API? #173

shaneutt opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
area/community-meeting Issues or PRs that should potentially be discussed in a Kubernetes community meeting. area/dataplane triage/needs-information Indicates an issue needs more information in order to work on it.

Comments

@shaneutt
Copy link
Member

When we originally started this project the dataplane code included a Kubernetes controller that would pull configuration from the Kubernetes API, after the controlplane had updated the relevant resources. We switched to a gRPC API with a push mechanism which was originally intended to be an interim solution to improve the development experience, testing and debuggability (e.g. you could manually push configuration changes from a console, see all the logs in one place, e.t.c.).

The purpose of this task after discussion with @astoycos and @aryan9600 is that we wanted to check back in and discuss whether we want to go back, or we actually want to keep the gRPC API, as there are pluses and minuses to both.

@shaneutt shaneutt added area/dataplane area/community-meeting Issues or PRs that should potentially be discussed in a Kubernetes community meeting. labels Jan 24, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt moved this to Backlog in Blixt Project Board Jan 24, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt added the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Jan 30, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt modified the milestones: v1.0.0 - Reference Implementation, v0.6.0 - Hardening Apr 19, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 18, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 17, 2024
@shaneutt
Copy link
Member Author

shaneutt commented Sep 6, 2024

We need to triage and discuss this again.

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/triage needs-information
/remove-priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/needs-information Indicates an issue needs more information in order to work on it. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Sep 6, 2024
@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from k8s-ci-robot Sep 6, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt removed the priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. label Sep 6, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt modified the milestones: v0.8.0 - Hardening FIXME, v0.8.0 - Hardening Oct 29, 2024
@shaneutt shaneutt moved this from Hold to Triage in Blixt Project Board Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/community-meeting Issues or PRs that should potentially be discussed in a Kubernetes community meeting. area/dataplane triage/needs-information Indicates an issue needs more information in order to work on it.
Projects
Status: Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants