-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide whether we keep the gRPC API? #173
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
We need to triage and discuss this again. /remove-lifecycle rotten |
When we originally started this project the dataplane code included a Kubernetes controller that would pull configuration from the Kubernetes API, after the controlplane had updated the relevant resources. We switched to a gRPC API with a push mechanism which was originally intended to be an interim solution to improve the development experience, testing and debuggability (e.g. you could manually push configuration changes from a console, see all the logs in one place, e.t.c.).
The purpose of this task after discussion with @astoycos and @aryan9600 is that we wanted to check back in and discuss whether we want to go back, or we actually want to keep the gRPC API, as there are pluses and minuses to both.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: