You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 30, 2020. It is now read-only.
I'd like quit version numbers like -rc.x in favor of semantic versioning because it isn't clear which changes are included or not in the rc.
The next kube-aws release can be 0.10.1 or 0.11.0 in theory. But it would be 0.11.0 as I'm merging #1233 which is a huge change, as you can't normally just kube-aws update your clusters from previous kube-aws versions. This is discussed in #1112.
I used to mark rc.1 to include a big feature on top of the latest final release, and the subsequent rc.2 to rc.N releases to include small features and fixes. But historically saying, any rc had been able to include breaking changes. rc.N versioning didn't differentiate such existence/inexistence of breaking change between rc's.
From another point of view, I just want to make sure every former "rc" release is considered production ready. I had been happily deploying rc's myself so from my perspective, it doesn't change anything in the quality of kube-aws releases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mumoshu
changed the title
Conform every release to semantic versioning
Conform every release inclufing final and rc to semantic versioning
May 5, 2018
mumoshu
changed the title
Conform every release inclufing final and rc to semantic versioning
Conform every release including final and rc to semantic versioning
May 5, 2018
I'd like quit version numbers like
-rc.x
in favor of semantic versioning because it isn't clear which changes are included or not in the rc.The next kube-aws release can be 0.10.1 or 0.11.0 in theory. But it would be 0.11.0 as I'm merging #1233 which is a huge change, as you can't normally just
kube-aws update
your clusters from previous kube-aws versions. This is discussed in #1112.I used to mark
rc.1
to include a big feature on top of the latest final release, and the subsequentrc.2
torc.N
releases to include small features and fixes. But historically saying, any rc had been able to include breaking changes.rc.N
versioning didn't differentiate such existence/inexistence of breaking change between rc's.From another point of view, I just want to make sure every former "rc" release is considered production ready. I had been happily deploying rc's myself so from my perspective, it doesn't change anything in the quality of kube-aws releases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: