-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup plan class #91
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(more a drive-by comment than a thorough review)
What is the exec space argument to the Plan constructor intended for? Allocation of internal buffers? What else? Why is it ok to hold on to that exec space? Should it be reused later when actually computing the FFTs?
fft/src/KokkosFFT_Plans.hpp
Outdated
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ class Plan { | |||
//! The type of extents of input/output views | |||
using extents_type = shape_type<InViewType::rank()>; | |||
|
|||
//! Execution space | |||
execSpace m_exec_space; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do you hold on to an exec space?
When one of the API function is called presumably you take an exec space as argument and you pass the plan. Then which exec space do you pick? Do they have to match? etc..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the moment, this internal exec_space
is unused. I will suppress this change in this PR.
Originally, I was inclined to use internal exec_space
for all the execution of FFTs and Kokkos functions, but it turns out that the changes are too big to be consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your review. I will merge this. Your reviews and/or suggestions are always appreciated!
Resolves #90
In this PR, we
Plan
classs